Ex-CJI Chandrachud clarifies Ayodhya verdict and Babri Masjid remark, stating that the Supreme Court’s decision was rooted in legal reasoning, not religious belief. Speaking amid a growing debate, he emphasized that the 2019 judgment on the Ayodhya land dispute relied on evidence and constitutional principles.
Ex-CJI Chandrachud clarifies Ayodhya verdict and Babri Masjid remark to address recent controversy over his comments. He explained that his reference to the “desecration” of Babri Masjid was not a personal opinion but a factual observation based on the court’s findings.
Justice Chandrachud, who was part of the five-judge bench that delivered the landmark verdict, reiterated that the judgment did not favor any faith. Instead, it resolved a complex legal dispute by analyzing historical records, archaeological reports, and legal claims.
He also stressed the importance of judicial neutrality and the need to separate personal beliefs from constitutional duties. His clarification aimed to dispel misconceptions and reaffirm the judiciary’s commitment to fairness. The Ayodhya case remains one of India’s most sensitive legal battles. Chandrachud’s remarks have reignited public discussion, but his explanation brings clarity to the court’s approach.
