During his Bhilwara visit, Togadia met Hindu organisation members and discussed unity and vigilance to preserve cultural heritage.

He also commented on the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists, urging authorities to include genuine Indian voters while excluding ineligible ones.

On the foundation laying, Togadia questioned the relevance of invoking historical figures like Babar and Aurangzeb today. He said, “Descendants of Maharana Pratap and Shivaji lead India’s politics today. No one can move forward by invoking Babar or Aurangzeb.”

His statements sparked debate about political symbolism and historical references in contemporary India.

The post Togadia Calls Babri Foundation Laying in West Bengal a Publicity Stunt appeared first on India Podcast.

Ex-CJI Chandrachud clarifies Ayodhya verdict and Babri Masjid remark to address recent controversy over his comments. He explained that his reference to the “desecration” of Babri Masjid was not a personal opinion but a factual observation based on the court’s findings.

Justice Chandrachud, who was part of the five-judge bench that delivered the landmark verdict, reiterated that the judgment did not favor any faith. Instead, it resolved a complex legal dispute by analyzing historical records, archaeological reports, and legal claims.

He also stressed the importance of judicial neutrality and the need to separate personal beliefs from constitutional duties. His clarification aimed to dispel misconceptions and reaffirm the judiciary’s commitment to fairness. The Ayodhya case remains one of India’s most sensitive legal battles. Chandrachud’s remarks have reignited public discussion, but his explanation brings clarity to the court’s approach.

The post Ex-CJI Chandrachud Clarifies Ayodhya Verdict Remark appeared first on India Podcast.