Justice Jasjeet Singh Bedi heard the petition in Court No. 52. The Bench questioned why the defence wanted the Commissioner of Police to appear in person. The judge noted that Sharma had no direct role in the investigation and did not figure as a prosecution witness.

During the hearing, the Court asked the counsel a pointed question in open court: “Why do you need the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to come to court? Just to give you a CCTV record?” The Bench found the explanation weak and expressed surprise over the trial court’s approach.

The High Court also objected to the Jalandhar court issuing bailable warrants for a senior officer. The Bench said such steps create unnecessary pressure and distract officers from their statutory duties. It also warned that courts should not allow defence tactics that aim to delay time-bound NDPS trials.

The Court noted that the officer had requested permission to appear through video conferencing. The Bench said the trial court should have considered that request. It viewed the insistence on physical appearance as unreasonable in the circumstances.

After hearing the matter, the High Court stayed the summoning order and granted relief to Swapan Sharma. The ruling sends a clear message that courts must not allow misuse of process to stall proceedings.

The Bench also took note of media reporting that followed the summoning order. It said speculative coverage can harm reputations and reduce public trust. The Court underlined the need for responsible reporting, especially when senior officers handle sensitive cases.

Overall, the decision reinforces that trials must move forward without unnecessary distractions. It also sets a firm standard for summoning senior officials only when the case truly demands it.

The post High Court Stays Summons to Ludhiana CP in NDPS Case appeared first on India Podcast.

Earlier, on December 17, a single-judge bench of Justice Biswajit Basu had cancelled the appointments. The court held that the teachers were recruited illegally in GTA-run schools across Darjeeling, Kurseong, and Kalimpong.

Challenging that decision, the GTA moved the division bench comprising Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury. The matter was heard at the Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench.

While granting the stay, the division bench noted that the single-judge order did not adequately consider key circumstances. The court observed that many teachers had served for long periods. It also noted that regular recruitment remained stalled for years due to prolonged political unrest in the hill regions.

The case stems from allegations that appointments were made without official notifications and outside established recruitment procedures. Earlier, the single-judge bench had ordered a CBI investigation into the matter.

That probe order was later modified after the Supreme Court ruled that the state CID would conduct the investigation instead. The main case on alleged irregular appointments remains pending before the High Court.

The post Calcutta HC Stays GTA Teacher Job Cancellation Order appeared first on India Podcast.

The bench reviewed the earlier submissions and sought clarity from all sides. It asked IAS Amrapali to file her counter before the next hearing. The court stated that her response will help in assessing the legal issues. The stay order brought the allocation dispute back into focus.

The judges then postponed the next hearing by six weeks. They said the court needs time to examine the records and arguments. The delay also gives Amrapali space to prepare her reply. The case has once again gained attention across administrative circles.

Legal experts say the matter could take several more hearings. They note that allocation issues often involve procedural complexities. The Telangana High Court stressed that all parties must follow the legal process. The case will now continue after six weeks with updated submissions.

The post IAS Amrapali Faces Setback in Telangana HC appeared first on India Podcast.