Justice Dipankar Datta led the Bench that heard the matter. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi appeared for Jacqueline Fernandez. He argued that the actor only received gifts from Sukesh Chandrasekhar, the key accused in the ₹200-crore money laundering case. Rohatgi claimed that investigators built the case as a cover for failed MCOCA charges, which could not stand in court earlier.

Jacqueline Fernandez repeated that she had no role in laundering money. She said her connection with Sukesh Chandrasekhar was personal and the expensive gifts should not be treated as evidence of crime. The Enforcement Directorate, however, has maintained that she gained benefits from the alleged conman. Officials claim that she accepted luxury items and financial help, which link her to the money trail.

The Supreme Court’s refusal to intervene means that ED proceedings will continue without pause. This decision is a major setback for Jacqueline Fernandez, who has tried for months to clear her name. The ruling also signals that the court wants the trial process to move forward, rather than end at the preliminary stage.

The case against Jacqueline Fernandez remains one of the most high-profile money laundering cases in Bollywood. Her legal battle has drawn wide attention from both media and the film industry. With this ruling, she now faces a long trial ahead, as the Enforcement Directorate continues to push its case.

The post Supreme Court Refuses to Quash Money Laundering Case appeared first on India Podcast.

Fernandez had earlier approached the Delhi High Court, seeking to dismiss the FIR against her. On July 3, 2025, the High Court declined her plea, stating that the trial court should examine the allegations. In response, Fernandez filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court, scheduled for hearing on September 22, 2025.

The ED’s chargesheet, filed on August 17, 2022, claims that Fernandez received gifts worth ₹7 crore from Chandrashekhar, despite knowing about his criminal activities. Fernandez has strongly denied all accusations, asserting that she was unaware of Chandrashekhar’s alleged crimes and received the gifts without any illegal intent.

This case has drawn major attention in the media, raising questions about celebrity involvement in financial crimes and the enforcement of India’s anti-money laundering laws. Legal experts say the Supreme Court’s decision could set an important precedent for high-profile cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

As the case moves forward, both the legal community and the public await the Supreme Court ruling, which may clarify the responsibilities of celebrities in financial and criminal investigations.

The post Jacqueline Fernandez Approaches Supreme Court in ₹215-Crore Money Laundering Case appeared first on India Podcast.