Speaking to the media, the Kadapa MP alleged that investigators focused on selected statements while overlooking other evidence. He claimed that a conspiracy is being created to implicate him in the case. Avinash Reddy also said he is ready to continue his legal battle to protect his rights.

The murder of former minister Y. S. Vivekananda Reddy in March 2019 remains one of Andhra Pradesh’s most discussed political cases. The case has seen multiple investigations, court hearings, and legal challenges over the years.

Avinash Reddy maintained that he has cooperated with investigators and denied any role in the crime. He said the Vivekananda Reddy murder case should be examined fairly and based on facts. The case continues to attract political attention across Andhra Pradesh.

The post Avinash Reddy Challenges Vivekananda Reddy Murder Case Allegations appeared first on India Podcast.

At the same time, Y.S. Sunitha, daughter of the late Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy, arrived at the court for hearings linked to the Viveka murder case. She presented her arguments against accused A8, A7, and A5, urging the court to continue the CBI investigation. Her presence drew media attention as the two high-profile personalities attended hearings in separate cases.

Despite being close relatives, Jagan and Sunitha did not greet each other at the court. Both remained focused on their legal proceedings and avoided any interaction. Their silence added intensity to the already charged atmosphere in the court premises.

After completing arguments, both Jagan and Sunitha left the court separately. The hearings in both cases concluded for the day, and further dates are expected soon. Legal teams on both sides stated that they will continue pursuing the cases with full attention.

The post Tense Moments at Nampally Court as Jagan, Sunitha Avoid Each Other appeared first on India Podcast.

Justice Jyoti Singh asked both sides to avoid melodrama and resolve basic issues without bringing them back to court. She also urged Priya Kapur’s counsel to ensure that the children’s needs never lapse again.

Senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, representing Samaira and her brother, argued that Sunjay Kapur had agreed to cover all educational expenses under the matrimonial decree. He claimed the fees delay created unnecessary stress for Samaira.

Priya Kapur’s lawyer Rajiv Nayar rejected the allegation. He said Priya had met every responsibility and accused the children of raising the issue only to get media attention. He added that the fees had already been paid.

The court continued hearing arguments on the children’s request to stop Priya Kapur from transferring Sunjay Kapur’s assets. They also questioned the authenticity of the will and accused Priya Kapur of “greed.”

Priya Kapur told the court that the children had already received ₹1,900 crore from the family trust. The matter will resume next week.

The post Karisma Kapoor Court Dispute Deepens Over Unpaid University Fees appeared first on India Podcast.

Fernandez had earlier approached the Delhi High Court, seeking to dismiss the FIR against her. On July 3, 2025, the High Court declined her plea, stating that the trial court should examine the allegations. In response, Fernandez filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court, scheduled for hearing on September 22, 2025.

The ED’s chargesheet, filed on August 17, 2022, claims that Fernandez received gifts worth ₹7 crore from Chandrashekhar, despite knowing about his criminal activities. Fernandez has strongly denied all accusations, asserting that she was unaware of Chandrashekhar’s alleged crimes and received the gifts without any illegal intent.

This case has drawn major attention in the media, raising questions about celebrity involvement in financial crimes and the enforcement of India’s anti-money laundering laws. Legal experts say the Supreme Court’s decision could set an important precedent for high-profile cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

As the case moves forward, both the legal community and the public await the Supreme Court ruling, which may clarify the responsibilities of celebrities in financial and criminal investigations.

The post Jacqueline Fernandez Approaches Supreme Court in ₹215-Crore Money Laundering Case appeared first on India Podcast.

Cook strongly rejected the allegations and Trump’s decision. She stated the move was not legally valid and confirmed she would not step down. Cook’s legal team, led by attorney Abbe Lowell, is preparing to challenge the dismissal, calling it an attack on the independence of the Federal Reserve.

Legal experts argue the President may have overstepped his powers. The Federal Reserve Act allows removal of governors only “for cause,” generally linked to misconduct during service, not past personal matters. This creates a legal gray area that could lead to a prolonged court battle.

The dismissal has triggered political and economic debate across the US. Observers warn that interfering with the Fed’s independence could shake market confidence and set a dangerous precedent. The case may eventually reach the Supreme Court, testing the limits of presidential authority over independent institutions.

The post Trump Fires Fed Governor Lisa Cook appeared first on India Podcast.