The Bhopal-based National Judicial Academy, under Justice (retired) Aniruddha Bose, will form a committee of experts to draft recommendations. The committee will study previous measures, consult legal and social experts, and consider the challenges faced by victims in accessing justice. The aim is to inculcate sensitivity, compassion, and understanding into judicial processes.

The bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi, and N V Anjaria highlighted that judges must be aware of the trauma faced by complainants. The draft guidelines should use simple and clear language so victims can fully communicate their experiences, avoiding complex legal or foreign terminology.

These directions came while disposing of a suo motu plea in which the Supreme Court overruled an Allahabad High Court judgment, clarifying that attempted sexual assault is a serious offence. The apex court emphasized that judicial decisions must reflect fairness, humanity, and sensitivity toward victims.

The Supreme Court orders NJA to frame guidelines for judges’ approach, marking a major step to strengthen judicial awareness and ensure compassionate handling of sensitive cases.

The post SC Orders NJA to Frame Guidelines for Judges’ Approach appeared first on India Podcast.

CJI Gavai highlighted that the judiciary functions as a collaborative institution. While judges are the final decision-makers, the registry, court staff, and members of the Bar contribute to drafting, reviewing, and implementing judgments. He stressed that this collective effort ensures transparency, efficiency, and accountability within the apex court.

In his speech, Gavai also called for closer engagement with the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and SCAORA on matters concerning judicial reforms and administration. He underscored the importance of including these professional bodies in discussions, reinforcing the concept of shared governance within the Supreme Court.

On a personal note, CJI Gavai reflected on his values and beliefs. A practicing Buddhist, he described himself as “truly secular” and expressed respect for all religions, including Hinduism, Islam, and Sikhism. He credited his inclusive worldview to his upbringing, particularly his father’s teachings and the influence of B.R. Ambedkar.

CJI Gavai’s farewell, marking his retirement on November 23, 2025, emphasized the need to uphold judicial independence, inclusivity, and democratic functioning. He encouraged future judges and staff to continue fostering collaboration and institutional integrity, ensuring that the Supreme Court remains a pillar of justice and fairness in India.

The post Entire SC Decision Making: CJI B.R. Gavai Highlights Collective Role appeared first on India Podcast.

Justice Mirza’s exit followed the dramatic resignations of Supreme Court judges Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Athar Minallah. Both judges said the 27th Constitutional Amendment weakens the Supreme Court and destroys the balance of the Constitution. Their statements encouraged more discussions among lawyers, lawmakers, and civil rights groups. Many legal experts now fear a long-term shift in the country’s constitutional structure.

The amendment establishes a powerful Federal Constitutional Court. This new court will decide all constitutional questions. The Supreme Court will now hear only civil and criminal cases. Critics say this change reduces the Supreme Court’s authority and places more power in the hands of the executive. Legal scholars also argue that the move breaks the spirit of judicial independence.

The amendment also extends Army Chief Gen Asim Munir’s tenure until 2030. This provision intensified the controversy and raised questions about military influence in political structures. Opposition parties claim the government wants to reshape institutions to strengthen its own power.

Justice Mirza, who was scheduled to retire in 2028, resigned to show his disagreement with the new system. His decision created a strong reaction in legal circles. Lawyers’ associations across Pakistan are planning discussions and consultations on the future of judicial independence.

The International Commission of Jurists also criticised the amendment. It said the changes threaten constitutional democracy and weaken key safeguards. Many observers now believe the country faces a historic moment that will shape its legal and political future for years.

The post Pakistan Judicial Crisis Deepens as Lahore Judge Resigns appeared first on India Podcast.

The government plans to introduce eight amendment bills in this session. The agenda includes the Panchayati Raj Amendment Bill and the Municipal Laws Amendment Bill, aimed at strengthening local governance.

A Motor Vehicles Tax Amendment Bill is also part of the list. The bill seeks to revise tax norms in the state. Another key proposal addresses Scheduled Caste categorization, which is expected to spark detailed debate in the House.

One of the most significant bills will replace an existing ordinance. The India International University of Legal Education and Research Bill, under the Bar Council of India Trust, will be presented. The proposed university is expected to expand opportunities for legal education and research in Andhra Pradesh.

These bills highlight the government’s focus on reforms, institutional development, and legal clarity. The session is set to continue with further discussions and debates on these proposals.

The post Andhra Assembly Begins, Eight Bills Introduced appeared first on India Podcast.

Singh sought anticipatory bail after the graft charges were levied against him. The High Court granted bail to a co-accused who allegedly accepted the bribe but denied the same relief to Singh. It also questioned why Singh was not arrested over the last four years and why the chargesheet had not been filed.

The Supreme Court bench, consisting of Justices JB Pardiwala and Sandeep Mehta, described the High Court’s order as “cryptic and unusual.” The Court said the High Court should have granted or denied bail based on merits. Justice Pardiwala also pointed out that the delay in arresting Singh for four years should have been in his favor.

While the High Court proceedings are still ongoing, the Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail. If Singh is arrested, he should be released on bail subject to conditions set by the investigating officer.

The post SC Grants Bail to Punjab Official in Graft Case appeared first on India Podcast.