The petition by X Corp, the parent company of X (formerly Twitter), argued that government orders directing content removal violated freedom of speech. However, the court dismissed these claims, highlighting the critical role of social media regulation in preventing the spread of unlawful or harmful content.

During the proceedings, the court observed that “social media regulation is a must” to maintain public order, security, and prevent misuse of digital platforms. It reinforced that platforms operating in India must adhere to the provisions of the IT Act and associated rules, including responding promptly to takedown requests issued by authorities.

The verdict marks a significant stance by the judiciary in balancing freedom of expression with the need to curb misinformation, illegal content, and other potential harms on digital platforms. Experts say this judgment underscores the Indian government’s ability to enforce regulations and ensure accountability among social media companies operating in the country.

X Corp now has the option to seek a review or approach the Supreme Court, but the Karnataka High Court’s ruling sets a strong precedent on the scope of government powers regarding online content regulation.

This decision comes amid growing debates over social media governance, user safety, and the responsibilities of global tech companies operating in India. The ruling is seen as a major affirmation of regulatory oversight in the digital space.

The post Karnataka HC Rejects X Corp Plea on Social Media appeared first on India Podcast.