Washington, D.C.: The White House has defended recent changes to the H-1B visa program, amid criticism that U.S. workers are being replaced by lower-paid foreign labor. The policy, which governs the employment of skilled foreign professionals in the United States, has become a flashpoint in ongoing debates over immigration, employment, and labor rights.
Critics, including some U.S. lawmakers and labor unions, argue that the H-1B program allows companies to hire foreign workers at lower salaries, potentially displacing qualified American workers. They contend that this undercuts wages in key sectors, particularly in technology, healthcare, and research, where H-1B visas are most commonly used.
In response, White House officials stated that the H-1B program is intended to supplement—not replace—the domestic workforce. A senior administration official explained, “The H-1B visa helps companies fill critical skill gaps while ensuring that American workers are not displaced. Companies must meet wage and labor requirements before hiring foreign professionals.”
The administration has also highlighted that reforms have been introduced to protect U.S. workers, including stricter wage thresholds, priority for higher-skilled applicants, and transparency measures to prevent abuse. Officials say the program supports innovation, economic growth, and global competitiveness while maintaining safeguards for domestic employees.
Labor economists note that while H-1B visas provide much-needed talent to sectors facing shortages, there is an ongoing need for balancing foreign employment with opportunities for American workers. “The key is enforcement and monitoring, so companies comply with wage rules and hiring priorities,” one expert said.
The debate over the H-1B program is likely to intensify ahead of upcoming U.S. elections, as policymakers weigh the economic benefits of skilled immigration against domestic employment concerns.
