The Meghalaya High Court granted bail to a 24-year-old man booked under the POCSO Act and made important observations on the purpose of the law. The court stated that the Act aims to protect children from sexual abuse and exploitation. It does not seek to punish adolescents in cases involving consensual conduct.
The case involved an adolescent boy, which raised legal questions about consent. The accused remained in custody for several months before approaching the High Court for relief. During the hearing, the defence argued that the interaction occurred with mutual consent and without force.
The court examined the case records and noted the absence of clear evidence showing coercion or manipulation. Judges said that each case under POCSO must be assessed on its own facts. They observed that the law should not be applied mechanically, especially when circumstances suggest a consensual relationship.
While granting bail, the court clarified that the order does not decide the final outcome of the case. The accused must cooperate with the investigation and appear before the trial court as required. The judges stressed that the trial process will continue and that the prosecution will have the opportunity to present evidence.
Legal experts welcomed the ruling and said it provides guidance on how courts should handle sensitive POCSO cases. They pointed out that the judgement highlights the need to strike a balance between child protection and fairness to the accused. Lawyers believe the order may help prevent misuse of the law in cases where consent is a key factor.
The trial court will now proceed with the case and examine all evidence in detail. The High Court’s observations are expected to influence how similar cases are approached in the future.
