The Election Commission of India (ECI) has firmly stated that the Election Commission alone decides SIR—the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. It told the Supreme Court on Saturday (September 13, 2025) that no other authority can interfere.
The ECI argued that any court direction to hold SIR at “regular intervals” would amount to judicial overreach. It stressed that electoral roll revisions and their schedules fall strictly within its own jurisdiction.
According to the Commission, electoral integrity depends on its independence. External interference could undermine the credibility of elections. The ECI pointed out that its authority comes directly from the Constitution. This constitutional mandate allows it to maintain accurate and updated voter rolls.
During the hearing, the Commission highlighted the risks of imposing uniform timelines for SIR across the country. Conditions vary from state to state, and flexibility is essential. The ECI said it carefully assesses each situation before deciding the timing of revisions.
The Supreme Court noted the submissions and will study the matter further. This case highlights the balance between judicial review and institutional independence. It also reinforces the ECI’s central role in protecting India’s democratic process.
